Put That Back » Pants

I Can’t Make this any Clearer

Damien Thorn — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:37:45 +0000

This is pretty obvious, but somebody ought to say it:

Charlie Parker was not a nerd.
Those pants didn’t cost $189.50.
That shirt didn’t cost $180.
You’d look like a tool in that outfit.
HE’S WEARING A BELT, NOT SUSPENDERS.

Enjoy the holiday!

Widsom

Damien Thorn — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:21:09 +0000

Hey ‘funny’ t-shirt wearing 22-34 year old guy. Yeah, the joke’s on the rest of us.

— Mike Pesca

Hey $189 pants-wearing guy. Let Mike know that the joke’s actually on you.

Getting in his Head/Getting in his Pants

Damien Thorn — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:32:57 +0000

Put This On asks: What’s going through this man’s mind?

Their uncharacteristically crude answer: “Yup. I’m fuckin’ tonight.” And they defy you to think of anything else.

I’m willing to bet he’s thinking: “This sweater is bad enough, and the bow tie adds insult to injury, but I hope nobody ever realizes that it’s me in these pants…”

“…or I’ll never get laid again.”

For future reference, outside of their dress shirts, Brooks Brothers is where you get your clothes when your rich, bored wife is dressing you.

This Is What They Call Help?

Damien Thorn — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:15:44 +0000

Nerdboyfriend wants you to pair this horrible coat:

With these terrible pants:

…in order to look like a character from an 80’s movie that bombed. All for the low, low price of just $1,206.81. Seriously.

I can’t remember who runs that site, but I hope he or she understands the kind of hell reserved for people who make suggestions like that.